It is sometimes the case that emotionally laden words and high-sounding concepts use what can only be described as semantic piggybacking. Their moral foundation rests on another meaning of the same word in order to make a different, less justified context more meaningful. In regular usage, ‘legitimacy’ refers not just to conformation to the law but to moral justification. Oxforddictionaries.com defines ‘legitimacy’ as “a. Conformity to the law or to rules. B. Ability to be defended with logic or justification; validity.” The definitions of this word can be numerous but run roughly along the same lines. However, when the same word is spoken in politics, it often simply refers to recognition of a state or authority by outside forces. The constituent theory of statehood holds that a state cannot be legitimate unless acknowledged by an already recognised state. The problem is that it lacks the former foundation of regular usage: moral justificat...